Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennie Everton Clarke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f e minist 15:46, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jennie Everton Clarke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Most of the sources listed are unavailable online. A search for other sources to support notability was unsuccessful. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep RS for a subject this old aren't readily available - will err to keep for historical context Cllgbksr (talk) 06:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as more history collections from GLAM institutions are digitized, online sources will be available to help fill out this article. TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Even with no sources, what is it about this person that makes them notable? Magnolia677 (talk) 20:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:11, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:11, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article makes reference to coverage subject received by American Magazine for her orphanage, that she was a woman running an orphanage for boys, evidently it wasn't the norm back in the day. Cllgbksr (talk) 00:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I looked through the sources included in the article, and Clarke seems to have gotten coverage in sources ranging several decades. Her time period and common name will make finding sources somewhat difficult, but I do think there are enough sources to meet notability requirements. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:15, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Further Comment The August 16th, 1900 edition of the "Christian Evangelist" contains a decent paragraph with details about the number of orphans Clarke cared for and some rather glowing praise. It can be found here on page 1044 (219 on the Internet Archive). There also seems to be a bit of coverage on newsapers.com, but I don’t have access to the website. Regardless, the books cited in the Wikipedia article contain several pages of coverage each, and there seems to be several media sources covering Clarke. There is enough information to write a substantial article even if we limit ourselves to the known sources, so I think notability requirements have been met. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 21:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per Spirit of Eagle. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:12, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.