Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Belmont

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Belmont

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NFOOTY Joeykai (talk) 22:13, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Since he she has never played soccer above the US-collegiate level and not received significant coverage, the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Belmont is a woman, just fyi. Joeykai (talk) 00:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – The article doesn't establish notability and there are no references given. it also contains some borderline WP:COPYVIO - some of this page appears to have been only slightly reworded. — Gasheadsteve ^{Talk to me} 09:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 17:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per reasons given by others especially the copyvio concern Spiderone 16:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.