Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakob Kullberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No clear rationale for deletion has been given. J04n(talk page) 11:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jakob Kullberg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for 5 years Boleyn (talk) 16:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 16. Snotbot t • c » 16:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure if he's notable or not (most sources are in Scandinavian languages) but if not, it might be a good idea to merge this to the page on his long-time collaborator the composer Per Nørgård. --Colapeninsula (talk) 17:40, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:04, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Several reliable sources have been added since the article was nominated. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - For the time being, information about him could be included in the article on Per Nørgård. In due course, he may well merit an article of his own but, it seems, he has some way to go yet.--Zananiri (talk) 12:50, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Michael Bednarek. It's not just Per Nørgård, Simon Holt has written pieces for him too. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.