Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Orreal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:47, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Orreal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been delisted by Sydney and never played a senior AFL match at the club, so fails the Australian rules football criteria of the sports notability guideline. Has some coverage from when he was drafted, but is that enough to pass the general notability guideline? Personally, I don't think so. Jenks24 (talk) 14:02, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 14:05, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 14:05, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Bit of a sad footy career, but he's not notable per WP:BIO Nick-D (talk) 02:04, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Unique draft history does just get over the notability line, regardless of whether he played at senior level. Significant, not trivial, stories about him exist in major reliable sources.The-Pope (talk) 23:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep There was a LOT of coverage about his drafting, with full articles that said a good about him (I can provide more details if requested), but that could well fit into WP:BLP1E. Apart from that there is not that much (mostly listing on injury reports). Outside of 1E is speculation he could make his debut (The Courier-Mail article hosted by Fox Sports) but that is very much a look what a local boy might do. IMO with the coverage outside the drafting and that footy players on AFL lists are not really low-profile the level of coverage puts him past BLP1E. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha Quadrant ^talk 14:03, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, despite the unusual circumstances of his drafting, I see nothing here except another hopeful professional Australian Rules player who had their dreams dashed. It's sad, but it's hardly notable. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 05:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.