Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iuliana Tudor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iuliana Tudor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's really nothing to indicate this individual is anything but an ordinary news presenter, and no indication of coverage outside routine announcements or the tabloid press. - Biruitorul ^Talk 15:46, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 16:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 16:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 16:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable television personality.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: We need to look at Romanian sources, if she was on a national program as a host for 8 years, the is likely enough for her to be notable in her homeland. Montanabw^(talk) 04:51, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I did look at Romanian sources, and like I said, the coverage either deals with routine/unquotable trivia (how her boss saved her life by lending her money, how she found a husband) to tabloid trash (how her first boyfriend broke her heart, how her husband stayed faithful, who was her surprise wedding guest, her advice on beating the heat). - Biruitorul ^Talk 14:33, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - numerous Romanian news references available. I've added a few to start. Article needs clean up and improved referencing, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 03:48, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, you've added some meaningless trivia - I've taken the liberty of writing out what those sources actually say, rather than dumping them in the first line, in contravention of WP:CITELEAD. Fulfillment of WP:BASIC remains elusive. - Biruitorul ^Talk 04:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia is not a gossip rag, and that seems to be the quality of the available references, including Romanian references (thanks Biruitorul!). I don't see that these sources allow us to write a meaningful encyclopedia article. Huon (talk) 18:37, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a weakly sourced vanity page at this point; no indications of notability or significance. Sources provided at the AfD have not been convincing. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.