Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Financial Center (Jersey City)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of tallest buildings in Jersey City. Consensus that NBUILD isn't satisfied. Discussions that the redirect target's list is too long can be held in a separate discussion on that page. (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 21:53, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

International Financial Center (Jersey City)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another ~~apartment~~ office building. No indication whatsoever of how this meets WP:NBUILD which require the building to have " historic, social, economic, or architectural importance" and receive significant coverage from reliable sources. Rusf10 (talk) 16:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 16:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 16:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Another huge construction project, covered in detail in sources such as the New York Times. The architects, Frank Richlan and Herbert Beckhard seem significant too and this was one of their major works. We should be adding articles about them, not deleting this. Andrew D. (talk) 18:11, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again, we need much more than one article in a local publication. Also, if the architects are so notable then why don't they have articles? And even if they did, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED.--Rusf10 (talk) 19:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included by Andrew D. in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:58, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Redirect to List of tallest buildings in Jersey City The 33rd tallest thing in any city is inherently non-notable on the surface (though not an apartment building, just another office). Nate • (chatter) 21:24, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Vote struck and changed to rd with other consensus, which is a fair result. Nate • (chatter) 01:45, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jersey City#Downtown Jersey City where it can be mentioned, there are sources tha tcan be added, jut not, I think,enough to support a page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:19, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of tallest buildings in Jersey City Djflem (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of tallest buildings in Jersey City. SportingFlyer T·C 18:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Not every generic office building is notable, even if it's tall and got routine coverage that a developer constructed it. Reywas92^Talk 20:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- There are a lot of redirect votes, but why? It it ranked as the 37th tallest in Jersey City (someone updated the list since the AfD was started). I have to ask the question, why is the list so long? At 303 feet, this building does not qualify as a skyscraper which must be at least 492 feet tall.--Rusf10 (talk) 02:39, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ATD, WP:NOTPAPER, WP:PRESERVE Djflem (talk) 07:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.