Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infant feeding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Infant nutrition. Discussion on titling can take place on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:04, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infant feeding

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

seems to be a poorly written version of Infant nutrition. Nothing on the page which couldn't be merged there, nothing which could be notable in this page which couldn't be within one of the related pages JMWt (talk) 11:01, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Health and fitness. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Infant nutrition and then initiate a discussion to swap titles. This page used to redirect to Breastfeeding, which is inappropriate. I changed it from a redirect to a stub as I wasn't aware that the Infant nutrition page existed. I agree with the nominator that Infant nutrition is much better. However, there is a lot more to infant feeding than nutrition, e.g., books have been written on how to introduce solids in a way that encourages the baby develop motor skills and good eating habits. Ideally, the content of what's currently in Infant nutrition would be under a title that allows for expansion into these other aspects of feeding. I'm happy to initiate the retitling discussion if nobody beats me to it. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 14:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, that sounds like a plan. I don't have an opinion as to which title to use, just thought it redundant to have two on the same subject. Happy to withdraw this AfD if this helps. JMWt (talk) 15:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to infant nutrition as the two pages are currently WP:REDUNDANT per User:Clayoquot’s argument. No preference regarding a title swap. Frank Anchor 14:29, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as per above. I sort of think that "infant feeding" and "infant nutrition" are two distinct but heavily overlapping topics, but don't know enough about the topic to say how the article should handle them. I'd support a re-titling discussion. Blue Edits (talk) 16:48, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to infant nutrition or Breastfeeding due to the topic already covered in these two articles

I strongly oppose a redirect to breastfeeding because that is just a single method of infant feeding (it would be the equivalent of redirecting “soft drink” to “Coca-Cola”). Infant nutrition is a much more inclusive topic and a better redirect target. Frank Anchor 13:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.