Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imminence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Imminence

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the entries on this page refer to pages that might otherwise be called "Imminent" or "Imminence". They are either WP:partial title matches or articles that simply use the words. In the case of the 2x bands - perhaps the only legitimate entries - they are actually are non-notable mentions. This page actively inhibits Search, which would be a better option for readers searching for occurrences of "Imminent" or "Imminence". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - A harmless disambiguation list. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:44, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — I have added an actual band Imminence (band), and {{In title}} to aid searching, and deleted some obvious partial matches. Until Imminence (law) is created Imminence#Law is useful. The page also serves to {{distinguish}} from eminence, immanence, and immanant. BTW I think Imminent (band) and Imminent (music) (both have incoming links) refer to the same one-person music project. jnestorius^(talk) 17:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: the band is the clincher: is the reader who wants "imminence" (why?) better served by landing on a page for a band or by finding this dab page? I've added Wikitionary links to help. Some of the entries may need a bit of tweaking - possibly a new set index page is needed to sort out the various "concept of imminence in law" items - but it's better than nothing at present. Deletion would not improve the encyclopedia,and nor would treating the band as the primary topic. PamD 09:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment from nom: I don't know how I missed the band. This is clearly keep, but I'll let it run its course without withdrawing it in case any other cleaner-uppers are attracted here. Thanks all, Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - perfectly good dab. Bearian (talk) 02:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.