Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyped España

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 06:52, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hyped España

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current references are just passing mentions. A lookup for "Hyped Espana" and "hyped.es" didn't yield any meaningful coverage. Fails WP:NCORP. MarioGom (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches turned up not enough to pass either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 December 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - previous discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyped es. Please also note that User:Trembolomano has tried a few times to disrupt this AfD so please be on the lookout. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - falls way short on WP:CORPDEPTH, also doesn't seem to pass WP:NWEB Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:44, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my comments in the previous discussion. (t · c) buidhe 18:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Significant coverage in several independent reliable sources is required to demonstrate notability. I couldn't find anything. Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not have significant coverage to meet notability. Chelokabob (talk) 04:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no significant coverage. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 15:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to find any indications that the topic meets any of our notability criteria. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:46, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.