Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of the Wolf Man
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Listed for 12 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- House of the Wolf Man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film which hasn't even been released yet. It's true that it stars Lon Chaney's grandson, but that still doesn't make the film notable. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 07:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and allow article to expand as it gets more press [1][2]. Won't see such horror films wriiten up in Washington Post, but then Fangoria and its like [3][4][5][6][7] do not write up pop stars, fast food, sporting events, or political issues. Genre films get their coverage from genre sources and in context to what is being asserted. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 22:48, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:17, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Principle photography has begun, sources apparently exist, so the article is appropriate to keep under WP:NFF. Rlendog (talk) 14:38, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.