Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hosted Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:36, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hosted Network

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company lacking non-trivial support. The article written by the company's Marketing Coordinator. reddogsix (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 17:29, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A non-notable company that fails WP:CORP. Seems like an advertisement. Nothing in the media seems to have ever referenced this company other than their own press releases. Trysha ^(talk) 18:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – No reliable sources evidencing notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 22:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG, fails WP:CORP. only trival coverage and related sources. See WP:CORPDEPTH --Bejnar (talk) 05:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.