Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Trinity Gateshead

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 12:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Trinity Gateshead

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. A small parish church founded in 2008; the article went up in 2008, 30 days after it opened. No references. DocumentError (talk) 22:20, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DElete -- I do not like having to delete articles on local churches, but we have nothing on its predecessors or any other substnative content. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:45, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'd try to rescue a church article if I thought it was Wikipedia-notable, but can't find evidence here. – Fayenatic London 22:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.