Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haragei

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haragei

Nonsense. Please see the discussion here. Oda Mari (talk) 20:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 23:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'd have to agree with the discussion referenced. Best deleted. Pigman☿/talk 01:14, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article makes no sense. Mantokun (talk) 05:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The dictionary definition part of the article doesn't belong in Wikipedia. The attempts to go beyond a dictionary definition are questionable. There's an awe-inspiring Buddhist image, but what does it have to do with haragei? The two parts, dictionary definition and beyond, have little relationship. The article is a dictionary definition that focuses on none of its meanings, but something else that someone wants it to mean. This makes it a coatrack. Fg2 (talk) 01:54, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The Buddhist/martial parts of the same concept are discussed more seriously (and verifiably) at Dantian. Jpatokal (talk) 02:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to be a mistaken version of what we have already at Dantian, which covers the verifiable aspects of this concept adequately. — Gavia immer (talk) 02:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.