Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halberd Airship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Kirby characters . MBisanz ^talk 05:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Halberd Airship

This article asserts zero notability through multiple reliable sources. In-universe details that are important to a plot in any of the Kirby media, Smash Bros series, etc belongs to that respective article. « ₣M₣ » 02:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. « ₣M₣ » 02:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete or Redirect to referenced video game series. 98.212.129.124 (talk) 05:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Kirby (series)--haha169 (talk) 05:41, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 10:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- There are no references and the article is just in-universe detail with no indication of any real-world importance. Reyk _YO! 11:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While it appears highly unlikely if this somehow survives the title should be moved. It should be at Halberd (airship) since it is an airship named Halberd and not Halbered Airship as a full name. --70.24.176.215 (talk) 02:15, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rename and Redirect to List of Kirby characters - The article focuses on the ship's use in SSB:B, but the it is a recurring element in the Kirby series. It is associated with Meta Knight and could probably be worked into his section. It already has casual mentions in the Dyna Blade and Meta-Knights sections of the page. —Ost (talk) 19:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rename and Redirect to List of Kirby Characters I agree, just casting my vote. The page was poorly written and doesn't include much detail. Add it to the refrenced game after rewriting it. Twinwarrior (talk) 05:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.