Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Going Dark
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Procedural close - No reason given for deletion, No objections to it being renominated if a reason's actually provided. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 20:08, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Going Dark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment-and what is the reason for the AFD?? Wgolf (talk) 19:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. No context. Is it a neologism? Is it a technology? Is it a website? ― Padenton|✉ 02:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Procedural Keep - No rationale for deletion presented by nominator. Carrite (talk) 00:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.