Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goddard.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Goddard.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No appearance of notability aside from the one hit single. Sourcing on page is poor and I could not find adequate additional material. The hit song is notable, yes, but that notability isn't inherited. I vote to reinstate the redirect I made which was undone. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:MUSICBIO#C2, although it doesn't help that his name is really difficult to google. I'll take a more comprehensive later on today.--Laun chba ller 04:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article has now been expanded considerably, meets WP:MUSICBIO#C6, and almost certainly meets WP:GNG and WP:HEY too. QuietHere - please consider withdrawing this.--Laun chba ller 13:37, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New sources are mostly as poor as what was already there. From what you've added, the only sources I'm sure are reliable are NME and The Line of Best Fit, and of those two the former hardly mentions Goddard and the latter is too short to be useful.The charting for "Go" along with released "Messy in Heaven" is promising, but I still don't see WP:GNG without better sourcing than this. No withdrawal at this time. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 14:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and England. Skynxnex (talk) 05:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep as improved. BD2412 T 01:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to assess recent improvements to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:MUSICBIO#C2 is sourced in article, multiply so. —siro χ o 07:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources added above look ok, not a strong keep, but weak keep. Oaktree b (talk) 14:19, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.