Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giuseppe Mitri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 09:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Giuseppe Mitri

Academic with no indication of meeting WP:ACADEMIC. Speedy request declined on the basis that he has an "interesting discovery", (though article makes no explicit claim as to the discovery's importance; and I'm not sure "could be a sign of" qualifies as a discovery) so AFD. Rd232 ^talk 13:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet inclusion guidelines or indicate basis for notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:42, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: no third-party sourcing and no articulation of notability. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 16:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Passes neither WP:PROF nor WP:BIO. Productive researcher, who may become notable in the future, but whose current modest citation impact is not enough to justify inclusion. The articles on Titan are fairly recent and have 25 or fewer citations to them on Google Scholar. Media coverage is also fairly modest at the moment.--Eric Yurken (talk) 01:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.