Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilfema

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gilfema

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBAND, no chart, no gold, no grammy. Noah ^💬 00:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Noah ^💬 00:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Noah ^💬 00:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Covered by All About Jazz, AllMusic, NPR, DownBeat, Vancouver Sun, The New York Times, etc. Caro7200 (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - whilst the albums may not have charted and the artist doesn't have a Grammy, this band appears to have enough coverage to meet notability guidelines as per Caro. For example, The Guardian, New York Times, Jazz Times and Financial Times so meets #1 of WP:NBAND as their works have achieved significant coverage. I also believe that #5 is met as they have released three albums on record labels that are notable themselves. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.