Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgian martial arts
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Shimeru 18:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Georgian martial arts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
Might be something worth adding eventually but this is just WP:OR with very little context and alot of POV. Peter Rehse 01:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep and rewrite. Current article appears to be an automated translation (and is thus a little incomprehensible) but a Google search suggests that there is such a thing. "Weak" because it's not clear just how notable it is. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. The copy can be cleaned up, but not the underlying content. It's trying to advertise how great Georgian martial arts is, so I place it within the G11 category, keeping in mind that I only apply that category to items that aren't really notable anyway. YechielMan 03:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Khridoli.--Paloma Walker 03:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Even Khridoli is debateable. 153 ghits which seem to point to one person and web site. I'd afd it also but would rather see how this afd plays out first.Peter Rehse 04:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete outright. The whole text is unsalvageably poor writing. - Richard Cavell 01:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I beg to differ. There are lots of articles in the English Wikipedia which contain poorly translated content. Such articles are usually tagged for {{cleanup}} at a later time. As for being "unsalvageable", I don't think that word means what you think it means... Aarktica 14:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep provided that it is rewritten. Otherwise, we've got an ad that's barely in English. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 04:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Geagea 00:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Eh, delete, no hope left here. Pavel Vozenilek 11:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete For anyone's information, if once translates the text to German, French, Portugese, Italian, Spanish then back to English it comes out looking like this: For informarte that the organization exists in „of Geórgia the martial members georgische (georgische martial of the members of „of the connection “) which has gathered the great materials by the years and sistematizza. That represents of Geórgia, the race of the passage of civilizzazioni western and of the east, it is a country of the cultivación and with other companies, known you with the great relative traditions Kampffähigkeit. Of Georgische the martial members had been enriched and fine in the battles of the meeting of Perser, the Greeks, the novel, the Arab, the Turks and the Mongols and are remarkable people with the relative originality. Among them, the diverse types are gaining „for extort georgische, khevsurian “to fight the packing of the city, a great attention. A detailed list capienza combative to be successful varied with packings of „martial relative of most interesting “is, sprechentricks the arm with the aid of a hat, khintkiria “time of „of strechings of Dolch, „the Morkia de Megrelian “and the etc is on the other hand that under variety, that it is efficient with the combat, of georgische of the members, with the diversity of the tradition and - effectiveness in the hand. The inheritance of the part of Kaukasier is not only cultural on the other hand. Suriel1981 23:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Ad, POV. JJL 02:31, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.