Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genç Fenerbahçeliler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Fenerbahçe S.K.#Supporters. Deor (talk) 12:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Genç Fenerbahçeliler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It should be merged with article of Fenerbahce SK. LardoBalsamico (talk) 08:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I think it should be merged with the main article because of recent events, there is a big friction going on with them and the club. With a recent court decision Fenerbahce sports club even closed their social media presence. Also again with the court decision, their names are going to change soon. Here's a link to that news Rivaner (talk) 08:46, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD from June 23, 2014 hadn't been properly formatted or transcluded—fixing. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect with/to Fenerbahçe S.K.#Supporters, no evidence of independent notability. Giant Snowman 11:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - per GS. Possibly warrants a sentence there. Fenix down (talk) 13:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - isn't the very existence of the article in the nominating statement evident of notability? Combined with other references in the article, I'm not understanding the basis nomination. Perhaps the nominator could expand on how this isn't notable? Nfitz (talk) 22:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -The original nominator is retired from wikipedia and the only reason he posted this nomination was because he had a personal vendetta against me.(This was the first article I edited on wikipedia ). He/she never taught I would accept his/her proposal. That aside, this supporters group is on the verge of closing and name change as I stated in my first comment, that is why, I think, this article should be deleted as it lost it's notabilty.Rivaner (talk) 06:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment - oh my! I'm torn between keep and merge. Not sure I'm on delete, given the references. Nfitz (talk) 01:14, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Fenerbahçe SK and Genç Fenerbahçeliler are different topics. One is a club and the other one is a supporters' group. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:54, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I have changed my vote to merge, since it is one of the more popular supporter group, event though it is going to close, it should have a mention in the Fenerbahçe SK page since they're a supporter group of Fenerbahce.
Merge - not independantly notable from Fenerbahce SK. 1292simon (talk) 09:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.