Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galway Intermediate Football Championship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gaelic Athletic Association. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 06:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Galway Intermediate Football Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
2019 Galway Intermediate Football Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2018 Galway Intermediate Football Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability; much of the content is unsourced, and the only secondary sources are routine sports coverage of individual games, something that explicitly isn't considered "significant" for the purposes of WP:GNG. Google Books gave zero results, Google News nothing better than what's there already. For the same reasons I'm also nominating the articles on individual years, 2019 Galway Intermediate Football Championship and 2018 Galway Intermediate Football Championship. Huon (talk) 12:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Huon (talk) 12:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Huon (talk) 12:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's the routine sports coverage that explicitly does not establish notability. See Wikipedia:Notability#Events. Huon (talk) 02:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
When it comes to leagues, I very much disagree - the fact a league gets continuous coverage in national and regional press clearly demonstrates the league is "of note," even if the coverage is just game coverage. Compare this to say a player whose name only gets mentioned in said coverage. I'm not sure what type of coverage you're specifically looking for here. SportingFlyer T·C 02:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
'Routine sports coverage explicitly does not establish notability', however Wikipedia:Notability#Notable_topics_have_attracted_attention_over_a_sufficiently_significant_period_of_time has mentioned that "sustained coverage is an indicator of notability". I would argue the point that as the coverage of this topic has been sustained for over 10 years through sources referenced that this would indicate the article satifies WP:GNG Keithopatches 12:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 12:15, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.