Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Men

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 03:57, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Future Men

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boarding school lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 01:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the article citing sources. Funny526 (talk) 03:21, 31 May 2019 (UTC) This user is currently blocked.[reply]
None of those sources are reliable independent secondary sources. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:26, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:35, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:35, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's a couple more sources of the same stripe as already referenced (basically extended press releases - e.g. [1]) but no substantial independent coverage. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass wp:gng. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:02, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Meatsgains:Hi there! I've added a few more sources. Does that solve the issue? Thanks! Davidbolthouse (talk) 20:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That would be those extended press releases I mentioned... --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note Davidbolthouse has been blocked indefinitely as an undisclosed paid editor. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:22, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the subject lacks sufficient independent sources to establish notability. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks the kind of coverage that would grant notability. Elements of paid editing also auger for deletion. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 13:48, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- O cannot believe that a school with just 15 pupils, though of High School age is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterkingiron (talk • contribs) 14:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.