Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesco D'Macho

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unanimity that the subject fails notability requirements. Just Chilling (talk) 15:59, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Francesco D'Macho

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another porn-related BLP without any independent reliable sourcing or any legitimate assertion of notability. Little more than a laundry list of NN videos and a pair of award citations that wouldn't even have satisfied the last version of PORNBIO. Also a licensing violation, since the base version of the text was an improper cut-and-paste userfication that didn't preserve the history of the originally deleted article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:53, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable pornographic performer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of any notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He lacks significant coverage in truly independent reliable sources and is therefore not notable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ANYBIO. AmericanAir88^(talk) 13:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.