Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forumosa (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forumosa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 19:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - one reference is the subject's own about page and the other two are dead. (Even if live, they are another of the subject's pages and a blog. Neither would be authoritative.)--Rpclod (talk) 19:37, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It appears unlikely this website is notable to Wiki standards as the best results I found were this and this. SwisterTwister talk 20:53, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication in the article why it should be notable, discussion forums are pretty much run-of-the-mill nowadays, I suppose. Kraxler (talk) 18:35, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.