Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faraun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 01:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Faraun

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear notable. Even a Google search with some additional parameters doesn't give anything useful. The only source is some very obscure book.

The article is generally very poor – see for example the factual error I explained on the talk page.

The only link to it from an article is in the "see also" section of Trpanj, the rest is just various talk pages and AfD/PROD logs. ~barakokula31 (talk) 22:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. According to the article, it is based on WP:ONESOURCE, which suggests the possibility of WP:V issues. A bit of quick Google-ing finds discussion of Faraun as a family name or a clan in Dalmatia, but nothing about the merchants discussed here. Cnilep (talk) 00:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Faraun does seem to be a family name, and, to me, the supposed derogatory origins in the section, Reaction, should be cited or removed. As there is no clear source, I think the rest could be deleted as well. Smmurphy^(Talk) 21:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.