Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Experiments with Time Travel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Experiments with Time Travel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A wholly non-notable videogame that does not seem to be able to satisfy the GNG at any time in the near future. Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No hits at all in typical video game sourcing, using WP:VG/RS custom reliable source search. Based on the "It uses Harry Potter story elements" I suspect it'd never be published. "Official" website is a blogspot, which describes it simply as "upcoming" with no real details. I'd almost say try to CSD it under A11 or G11. -- ferret (talk) 01:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are complete non-commercial, famous novels based on Harry Potter e.g. HPMOR. So there is no question of non-publication as the blog does not indicate that the game is commercial. The article clearly states why the game is notable. There are at-least thousands of people out there who would like to be informed of such a game. Whenever a person looks for games in the Time-travel video games category on Wikipedia, they should not be left out from knowing about this game. Gameplayer10 (talk) 08:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it exists, doesn't mean there should be a Wikipedia article about it. If "thousands of people" would want such a game, probably a reliable source will report on it, then we'll do too. --Soetermans. T / C 15:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable video game. It might be too soon for an article on this topic. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable unreleased product -- WP:TOOSOON to pass WP:GNG, no multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 15:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.