Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everybody's Gone
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:42, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Everybody's Gone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have added a book reference, but otherwise there are very few WP:RS that I can find anywhere. I think the award from the Chicago Film Festival should count for something, but I can't find a reliable source for this claim. There has not been significant coverage of this film in the media or elsewhere, so in my view it is dubious whether it meets the WP:GNG JMWt (talk) 12:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Atlantic306 (talk) 02:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- alts:
- type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- year:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- writer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 18:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 18:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete at best as none of this currently suggests better satisfying the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.