Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evergreen Media Europe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 22:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Evergreen Media Europe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This may be a case of WP:ENN. If one looks through the very long list of credits in the IMDb reference -- which of course should not be used as a reference at all -- one sees a huge list of programs on which they appear to have provided technical services. Moreover, I can't find a single reliable source mentioning the company. It seems to fail WP:NCORP completely. Am I missing something? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I just cannot see any sources that say anything more than they exist, no WP:ORGDEPTH. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:20, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I should add that the article creator has added a long list of "productions." If you go to their corporate website, http://www.evergreenmediaeurope.com/index.php?option=com_joomdragdrop&view=custom&Itemid=156, you will see a long list of programs on which they've offered what they call "directorial services." And IMDb does also list a lot of "productions," I see. So in that respect my nomination statement was in error. There is an article on a 1-hour TV drama produced by them, Murad (film) as well as the series Ariel Mothers. And the SPA editor has also just created a somewhat spammy article on producer Kamran Qureshi - omitting that he is employed by Evergreen. This company appears to be a prolific UK-based producer/re-packager of programming for the India/Pakistan markets. An Urdu/Hindi language search may be necessary to see whether it does indeed meet WP:NCORP, per Wikipedia:Points to note while debating in WikiProject India related AFDs. I'll tag it to those deletion sorting pages now. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete ~~Comment:~~ I'm thinking there may be enough to write about the Evergreen Media Group, but not for something specifically IMDB titled "Evergreen Media Europe". Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:47, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Right and it seems to be a completely different outfit, even if there may be some corporate connection. The credits look different. The article creator seems to be interested in the India/Pakistan market at least so far. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:34, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with deleting this one. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 23:59, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a useless listing of non-notable TV productions, see also WP:NOTADIRECTORY and WP:LISTCRUFT. Kraxler (talk) 13:32, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.