Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic key management
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Electronic key management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is far from my field, but I couldn't find evidence to verify its notability. Boleyn (talk) 21:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:33, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I am google searching, and most of the results are ads/how-to's. I am going to try to find non-ad sources, but unless I find something (unlikely), Delete.68.233.214.74 (talk) 19:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - All the sources I find are press releases or puff pieces set up to advertise a product. Not notable.Glendoremus (talk) 04:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.