Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Effectiveness of antibacterial soups

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 12:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Effectiveness of antibacterial soups

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article meets Wikipedia:No original research criteria for deletion Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:46, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete content merge into antibacterial soaps. There is no article effectiveness of antibiotics or effectiveness of vitamin pills, the content is just inherently part of the subject itself.- Augustabreeze (talk) 12:52, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I agree with Augustabreeze (talk · contribs), but I think content could only be merged after finding reliable sources.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 13:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:OR or WP:RS are enough to kill it, but I don't think it fits into any speedy deletion criterion.Tigraan (talk) 13:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was intrigued initially but the title is a misprint - it should be soap not soup! Andrew D. (talk) 13:27, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have seen much better written articles that make the same mistake. As Augustabreeze said: The main aspect of antibacterial soaps is their effectiveness. There is really no difference between the articles "anti-bacterial soap" and "the effectiveness of anti-bacterial soaps." The same as "light bulb" and "the light provided by light bulbs." Borock (talk) 16:39, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Under A10 (already covered by existing topic and does not expound upon it), and G12 (Copyright) as pretty much every sentence I search on is copied from another source. Some WP, some Facebook, WHO, etc. Crow^Caw 22:50, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and no redirect, unless people will be searching for soup instead of soap. Crow^Caw 22:51, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crow My wife makes a great antibacterial SOUP. It's so bad, not even bacteria would touch it. Bgwhite (talk) 01:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sting.ogg Crow^Caw 16:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as OR. PianoDan (talk) 15:37, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.