Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edzperanto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edzperanto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable pun. TheLongTone (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete at best actually because this is questionable for a better applicably notable encyclopedia article, unlikely solid enough yet. Keep or at best Merge to Raymond Schwartz as Books particularly found a few links suggesting this can be kept. Notifying DGG for analysis. SwisterTwister talk 02:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Utterly insignificant. We're not a pun dictionary. DGG ( talk ) 03:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with DGG. Insignificant, particularly as far as English speakers are concerned. There is an article Edzperanto in the Esperanto Wikipedia. It cites only the same dead link to the Schwartz poem that is in this article and which I have just tagged as a dead link. If it belongs anywhere, an article on this term belongs in the Esperanto Wikipedia. Also see: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. It seems that little, if anything, can be found or sourced in English about this other than its definition and the poem. Donner60 (talk) 04:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.