Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund Knock
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete both articles. - Mailer Diablo 10:29, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This is a possible hoax, Google turns up a lot related to such a person. I did check alternate spellings. -- Curps 18:34, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, this article is absolute rubbish. Delete as all characters are fictional. -- unsigned comment by User:Mafr100
The following was added after the above vote:
Also Timothy Cork by the same author Edmundknock (talk · contribs) -- Curps 18:38, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. What a fantastic story! - Dalbury (talk) 01:39, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This is confusing. I deliberately posted my vote on Edmund Knock above the line adding Timothy Cork because I thought Timothy Cork was listed elsewhere. By rearranging this discussion, Curps has made it look as though I was voting on both. As it happens, Timothy Cork also looks very much like a hoax, but I didn't know that when I voted on Edmund Knock. - Dalbury (talk) 11:03, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The author almost had me until Knock spent time at an Inuit camp in Newfoundland. Um, no. Bearcat 06:19, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax. No google references other to a kid who won a scholarship to Sedbergh School (hmm!) and is also not in the Dictionary of Canadian Biography which is pretty comprehensive on explorers. Luigizanasi 06:34, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Probably a hoax. *drew 01:51, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.