Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESO (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:33, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ESO (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for non-notable band, which fails all the criteria at WP:BAND and WP:GNG. Only referenced from the band's own facebook page. Purported record label is owned by band members (not to be confused with notable publishers with a similar name). Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 18:01, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 18:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. In what way is it promotional? Would someone read this article and want to go and buy the band's records? No. --Michig (talk) 19:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because the subject is not notable and for that reason only. No real reliable source coverage found and I don't see any other criterion of WP:NBAND being met here. --Michig (talk) 19:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:46, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist Nordic Nightfury 15:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic Nightfury 15:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 15:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 15:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Possibly advertorial. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 16:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.