Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunlop hill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. (non-admin closure) Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:01, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dunlop hill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:GEOLAND - Possible merge with main Dunlop article Diagear (talk) 04:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I was able to find at least two sources (1 and 2), both of which describe the hill, the castle on it and some of the geographical features. There are more sources beyond that. Should be easy enough to properly reference. The fact that they haven't been added to the article is no reason to delete. St★lwart¹¹¹ 06:43, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating a geographical feature for deletion an hour after the article was created and without trying to WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM is a bad idea at the best of times. But citing WP:GEOLAND (which is a question of whether sources exist for named geographical features) when sources clearly exist is a failure of WP:BEFORE and not the way to conduct new page patrols. St★lwart¹¹¹ 06:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies: WP:GEOLAND was clearly a mistag. Diagear (talk) 07:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think the nomination was a mistake and represents a failure to conduct a basic Google search per WP:BEFORE. Care to withdraw it? St★lwart¹¹¹ 07:12, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'll like to withdraw deletion and take your advise on board on future nominations. thanks Diagear (talk) 07:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.