Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Lisa McEntee-Atalianis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per consensus and per CSD G12. Insufficient evidence that the source page is under a free license. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Lisa McEntee-Atalianis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO jsfouche ☽☾ talk 14:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 14:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 14:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 14:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Appears to fail the WP:Notability (academics) criteria. This person is however an expert in their field, there just does not seem much in the citations given to demonstrate sufficient awards or international recognition to justify a stand alone BLP at this time. Fæ (talk) 14:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Few cites on GS. Far too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Comment: no other edits. —Tamfang (talk) 20:49, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that what Tamfang means is that Kevfuhustle, the creator of this page, has not edited any other pages. Do I understand you correctly, Tamfang? Cnilep (talk) 12:51, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Er, yes. —Tamfang (talk) 20:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Appears to be copied from Dr. McEntee-Atalianis's university web site, which contains no explicit release of copyright. Cnilep (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have blanked the page as a possible copyright violation instead of speedily deleting it as I am taking this to be an assertion of permission. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I noticed that, too, but it's not clear if that actually came from anyone at Birkbeck. Cnilep (talk) 04:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.