Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. D Studios
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to George Miller (filmmaker)#Dr. D Studios. (non-admin closure) Sprinting faster (talk) 15:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Dr. D Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NN also seems to be a promotional ad. Jab843 (talk) 04:49, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to its founder at George Miller (filmmaker)#Dr. D Studios where this production company is already mentioned. While promotional tone can almost always be addressed through regular editing,[1] and this production facility does have coverage,[2] what I see as the greatest issue here is that so far they have only one film in their portfolio... the corporate version of WP:ONEEVENT... and so far, it lacks suitable independent notability which might merit a separate article. Best we redirect to the one place where it is currently reasonable that it be discussed in relatonship to its founder. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:26, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Although there is a fair number of Google News results, almost all of it relates to George Miller andor Happy Feet 2. The company is slated to work on Mad Max 4 and Miller's future projects (I remember hearing about a Justice League film Miller had got the rights to plus something else, but can't source them at the moment), but when Mad Max is drifting in and out of development hell and you've got news articles like [3], [4], and [5] claiming that the company is about to be canned because of Happy Feet 2's poor performance and disagreements between Miller's company and another partner-company, I don't think Dr. D. will be around much longer. Were there much content in the article, I would suggest merging to Miller or Happy Feet 2, but the incarnation of the article I see has little that isn't already in either article. So, redirect to George Miller. -- saberwyn 02:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.