Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirty Lilly
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete (A7). howcheng {chat} 07:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Short article that mostly consisted of a copyrighted porn image that I removed. Probably not notable. Delete. Kusma (討論) 04:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Expand. "Dirty Lilly" seems notable with 42,200 results on a google test, but the article is only one sentence long. Delete only if impossible to expand. SycthosTalk 05:22, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I've tagged this as a nn-bio speedy. Simply saying "porn star" is not a claim to notability. If the author of this sub-sub stub couldn't be bothered to make any more effort, we really don't have to preserve their name in the history forever. Delete it, and if someone wants to write a real article with actual sources, give them a biscuit. - brenneman(t)(c) 06:30, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.