Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimension Studios
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mostly Rainy 06:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Prod reason was "blatant advertising." I agree, delete. Mangojuicetalk 20:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't delete Its not advertisement, theirs pleanty of information given
- Don't delete. The studio is exceptional in the fact that it offers level design for video games upon requests from individual customers, not game companies as all other studios do. In doing so the studio is pioneering this area of video game market. No other studio takes requests from average players to provide them with what they desire. The article's purpose isn't to advertise the studio but to rather describe the new trend in video game development that the appearance of this studio shows. With the modern technology, level design becomes such an accessible tool that it can now be done on a smaller, individual scale rather than through mass-produced video games as it was before. From the previous suggestions on deletion I see that this idea wasn't expressed clearly enough in the article therefore it will be edited, NOT deleted.
- Delete. It is a profitable group of people and not notable and I agree with Mango on that it's very self-promotional.--Andeh 20:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above Nuttah68 20:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete blatant advertisement. -- Kicking222 20:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - obvious advertisement and not notable michaelCurtis talk+ contributions 21:10, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable studio. Grandmasterka 02:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete looks like an advertisement to me -- Runcorn 17:29, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.