Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Throat This
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 22:06, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Deep Throat This (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Orphaned and tagged for no sources since 2009. Not notable. Cleanliness (talk) 20:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:13, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as no reason to believe this series is notable. Tryphaena (talk) 21:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a substitute for any other website that dedicates to pornography. No casual person knows this movie or its cast. Why does this article exist in the first place? Its subject does not meet the WP:N guidelines, no news coverages, and no reliable sources found in Google. I think: the results may be the same with other search engines. --Gh87 (talk) 21:25, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete First off its disgusting, but Lack of sources is a better argument, entirely fails WP:GNG, not a single source. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 04:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This fails WP:GNG. There's nothing here that suggests it's more notable than any of the other porn series out there. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:13, 23 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.