Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniela Zacherl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Academic Challenger (talk) 18:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daniela Zacherl

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP. IMDb and her own website are inadequate. This has been unimproved for 7 years Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

She is notable enough by Wiki's biographical standards to warrant herself an article and I'm sure there are several articles out there that can help with the referencing. That being said, I am not keen any longer in keeping the page updated. Since there is not much interest from the community either, I do not object the proposal to deletion. – StreetSoda_{talk 14:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)}[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 21:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 21:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 21:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there are no independent references with in depth coverage in the article and while there are plenty of google hits across multiple languages none of them are clearly independent and reliable. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete IMDb is not a reliable source. A subject's own website is not a reliable source. We cannot keep an article with 0 reliable sources, especially on a living person, and no one has in any way indicated what sources would add up to passing GNG. Actresses do not get articles merely for having had roles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Also one of the few facts here is incorrect: she's Austrian, not German. --Lockley (talk) 18:27, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.