Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DVD43 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DVD43

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (web). A simple google search shows you downloads and where to download it, nothing reliable. Previous discussion to delete this article was all deletes, the reasons were that the article fails GNG.`~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 22:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. `~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 22:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks like nothing much has changed in the last 14 years re notability, and the website has been highjacked. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, no sources. MaterialWorks _(talk) 23:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.