Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowdsensing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mobile Crowdsensing. Joyous! | Talk 00:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crowdsensing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary article. Unreferenced. Rathfelder (talk) 23:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a valid stub. This is a relatively new term, but there are plenty of books and articles written about it that can contribute to this article. A few examples: [1] [2][3] [4][5] Bradv 23:34, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mobile Crowdsensing, per comments below. Bradv 01:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sources not enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Redirect to Mobile Crowdsensing, a better article. Crowdsensing usually means mobile crowdsensing and a WP:BEFORE style search shows that "mobile crowdsensing" has reasonable sourcing including a number of secondary reviews out there. Indeed most of Bradv's sources are about mobile crowdsensing. Crowdsensing is a plausible search term, hence a redirect is warranted. --Mark viking (talk) 01:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can get behind that. I wasn't aware of the quality of that article, so never considered that option. There's probably no point in having two articles, so I'll change my vote. Bradv 01:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perfectly happy with that optionRathfelder (talk) 20:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.