Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coate's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:09, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coate's

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage even after its disfunction. Fails WP:NORG. Greenbörg (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- No secondary references in article ... and nothiong signficant that I could find easily elsewhere. Rhadow (talk) 22:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NORG due to lack of coverage.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.