Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chipmunk DJs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Rje 15:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable term developed "primarily on the internet" - except there's only 6 hits on Google: 2 from WP and 4 in blogs. Prod was removed with an edit summary admitting that there's no such term as Chipmunk DJs. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no verification that this term is in use anywhere, except a few blogs. Kevin 04:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wknight. -- Kicking222 04:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. DarthVader 08:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --Terence Ong 12:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above.--Jusjih 13:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment people might want to take a look at DJ Rankin, an article linked to by this article. Might warrant deletion.--Drat (Talk) 15:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Rename there is no doubt that the culture described in the aricle exists, though the name given to these people varies. A visit to mixstreet.net will show you exactly the kind of things in the article. Re-titling the article would be more constructive than deletion Eltyrub 19:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep agree with above; I have heard the term 'Rip Off DJ' used more prevalently than 'Chipmunk DJ', though the information is still 100% accurate 217.206.85.3 11:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I'd recommend giving some sources for some other term if you want anyone to change their vote. —Wknight94 (talk) 14:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While this probably does exist and might be applicable to one of our many articles about dance music and/or online music, the article as written seems more like an attack page, particularly against the people who are specifically named there. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:15, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete.. Agree with sentiments above. --Woohookitty(meow) 06:36, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.