Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chief Kamachi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 04:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chief Kamachi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find a single reliable source that discusses or interviews this topic. Indeed, the article itself has no third-party sources. The only external link is to the MySpace article. In short, this AFD is on the grounds that there is no indication of importance or significance, based on the complete lack of sources in the article or via google searches. — Timneu22 · talk 10:37, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Also adding to this AfD :
The Clock of Destiny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Codf1977 (talk) 11:31, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Should all of their album articles be deleted if the primary band article is? It seems so (A9). — Timneu22 · talk 11:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Probably - but as that was a new page thought it best to this AfD. Codf1977 (talk) 15:08, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.