Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centro Bonó

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pedro Francisco Bono Institute. Were it not for the question about meeting WP:V, I would have closed this as merge. As it is, the history is still intact so if anybody wants to merge material, they can do so, but they'll need to ensure that anything merged meets WP:V. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:52, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Centro Bonó

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 21:34, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:19, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:19, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 01:49, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet notability standards.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Pedro Francisco Bono Institute, after removing primary sources. Pjposullivan (talk) 21:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Pedro Francisco Bono Institute, which it mentions. At its own, this article fails WP:GNG to be a standalone article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - after looking for English sources, gave up. But, an article isn't on the Spanish Wikipedia, for what it's worth. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to above target. content does not appear to be verifiable. Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 21:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.