Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameroonians in Norway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Immigration to Norway. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cameroonians in Norway

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable group; fails WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not a database for every expat group under the sun. Curbon7 (talk) 12:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups, Cameroon, and Norway. Curbon7 (talk) 12:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I am not offended by anything, nor am I trying to violate Wikipedia’s notability guidelines, argue, or be rude, but I don’t think it is necessary to delete this article, because I believe it is essential information, and I believe Wikipedia needs information about these types of things. Please understand that I am not trying to lie, or violate any Wikipedia protocols whatsoever. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 14:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Probably not notable, as numbers less than 1000 individuals. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 19:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing to suggest that the topic is notable user is being VERY disruptive with multiple articles like this. Theroadislong (talk) 15:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Immigration to Norway, same rationale as with all other mass creations here. MarioGom (talk) 08:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Immigration to Norway; a group consisting of some nine hundred people just doesn't seem like there is going to be enough for an article. If it were about emigrants of a broader geographical area (like Africa, or sub-Saharan Africa) there would be a solid argument for a standalone article, but it is hard to imagine something like this becoming an article of note (in a way that's substantially different from, say, Senegalese people in Norway). jp×g 22:08, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.