Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CEOWorld Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus following relisting. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CEOWorld Magazine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable magazine sourced to press releases. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are no signs of better satisfying the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—Not seeing a path to notability with what's out there. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 08:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete— Publication article of unclear notability, lacking significant RS coverage. Refs are press releases, huffpo pieces by the Editorial Director of the magazine, or incidental mentions.Dialectric (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.