Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Hills Easley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:16, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Hills Easley

I'm not personally convinced that this individual is notable enough to require an article. I have found no other sources on this individual.-- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 17:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. No evidence of notability. This sounds like its been copied from a newspaper obituary. Most newspaper obits describe persons not actually notable enough to be in Wikipedia. Bwithh 18:27, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. B.Wind 20:03, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.