Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Elementary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brooke Elementary School

Not notable Epbr123 23:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now that is an NN school article. Delete unless sources & notability given. EliminatorJR ^Talk 23:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. They don't even have a school website. Ab e g92contribs 00:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: ... W... T... H... Someone should forbid five years to create an Wikipedia article. George Leung 00:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Noroton 01:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N and WP:A. I would have said 'merge to the district article', but there's nothing to merge. --Butseriouslyfolks 01:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Butseriouslyfolks rational. Xarr 15:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is actually the second AfD nomination for this school. The first came last summer as part of a mass deletion of about a dozen articles, and the result was "keep" It was stated then that some project was underway to create articles for schools in the same area. Obviously that didn't work out and it's been a stub for the past nine months or so. I did run across an interesting essay in that deletion debate. The essay goes into arguments both for and against deleting school articles, and its very articulate. I wish I'd seen it earlier. It's here: Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments Noroton 21:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That's a very good essay, and I hasn't seen it before either. Now all we need is a decent guideline for WP:SCHOOL :) EliminatorJR ^Talk 09:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Butseriouslyfolks MetsFan76 11:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.